Customer Evidence
Discovery, configuration, logs, code, cloud inventory, relationships, documents, and other customer-authorized evidence remain tenant-scoped inside Forge.
Forge combines customer-authorized evidence, curated enterprise knowledge, and a controlled reasoning layer so answers can be traced back to what was actually observed or retrieved. When the evidence is not strong enough, Forge is designed to say so instead of filling the gap.
Forge separates customer facts, reusable knowledge, and reasoning so a general technology document can never silently become a claim about a customer's environment.
Discovery, configuration, logs, code, cloud inventory, relationships, documents, and other customer-authorized evidence remain tenant-scoped inside Forge.
Curated Forge knowledge and approved external references can be retrieved when relevant, with provenance, source identity, freshness, and confidence retained.
The Reasoner evaluates evidence and knowledge together, labels inference, detects gaps or conflicts, and can withhold an unsupported conclusion.
Every AI-supported answer is designed around three truth levels that stay visibly distinct.
Directly supported by customer-authorized evidence. This is the strongest basis for statements about a customer's actual environment.
Supported by curated documentation or approved reference material. Useful for explaining technology, behavior, requirements, and known patterns.
A reasoned conclusion rather than an observed fact. Forge should label it, explain its basis, and avoid presenting it as verified evidence.
The goal is not merely to filter a final answer. Protection is applied before retrieval, during reasoning, and before any consequential action.
Weak matches are not treated as sufficient support for customer-specific claims.
Forge tracks where supporting information came from, when it was observed, and what type of source it is.
Customer evidence, retrieval history, and generated artifacts stay bound to authenticated tenant context.
Instructions found inside retrieved documents are not automatically trusted as system instructions.
Conflicting sources are flagged instead of quietly blended into a false sense of certainty.
Age and recency can be considered when deciding whether evidence is still appropriate for a current answer.
Knowledge ingestion is designed to check rights, scope, duplication, secrets, and provenance before global reuse.
High-impact actions stay separated from analysis and require explicit human approval, scope, and audit.
Forge can use external retrieval infrastructure for curated reusable knowledge without turning customer-specific evidence into a global knowledge pool.
Forge's AI-driven knowledge base is designed as a governed ingestion and retrieval process rather than an uncontrolled dump of documents.
Determine source, owner, scope, and intended use.
Confirm the material can be used and whether it is global or tenant-specific.
Scan for secrets, sensitive data, duplicates, and obvious ingestion risks.
Add approved material to the searchable knowledge layer with metadata.
Return only relevant material and keep source identity attached.
Forge distinguishes evidence from inference and records what supported the answer.
A simple rule illustrates the boundary.
I don't currently have verified customer evidence identifying that application's production database. I can answer once application-to-database evidence is available.
Observed customer evidence shows the Billing Application depends on PROD-SQL-04, identified as Microsoft SQL Server 2022. The supporting relationship can be opened and reviewed.
Forge is being built to connect reasoning to evidence, expose uncertainty, preserve customer boundaries, and keep people in control of consequential decisions.